Subscribe to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here     Contact Rich Miller
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here. Subscriptions are $350 per year. To advertise on the Capitol Fax Blog, please click here.
Marin stands with Netsch on con-con

Monday, Oct 13, 2008

* Carol Marin begins her latest column by “thanking” the state’s powers that be for uniting divergent groups on behalf of a constitutional convention

The reason that we should salute Rod Blagojevich, Mike Madigan and Emil Jones, our fearless Democratic leaders, is that their toxic, ego-driven, Bermuda triangle of a relationship has so poisoned Springfield, so paralyzed the General Assembly, that the citizens of this state who’ve been forced to watch their antics like endless episodes of “Days of Our Lives” are desperate to fight back.

We have a former governor in federal prison, a current governor under federal investigation, and thanks to Jones’ Senate deep-sixing what Madigan’s House passed, no mechanism for a recall of officeholders.

So, suddenly, a Con-Con has sex appeal.

In the end, however, Marin sides with Dawn Clark Netsch, who opposes the convention…

Like Netsch, I believe that a Con-Con this time around will become a battleground for social issues, shoving aside less flashy but urgent discussions of fiscal policy and education.

Like Netsch, I believe the biggest problem we have right now isn’t the Constitution but the people we’ve put in power.

And so like Netsch, I’m going to say no to Con-Con.

Personally, I think the convention as social issue battleground is overrated. So what if that happens? The General Assembly rarely has a “real” debate on any of these issues, so why can’t citizens do it themselves? Is a debate so bad? And, don’t forget, Illinois voters have the final say on the finished product.

Also, as I’ve pointed out numerous times before, the problem with saying we should just elect new people isn’t valid because 1) legislators choose their voters, not the other way around; and 2) the power of the leaders is so intense and complete that new members don’t have an impact. Look at what happened in 1994 if you want proof. The House Republicans found themselves with 13 new GOP members. The same leadership team stayed in place and it rammed its agenda through both chambers. Two years later, many of the newcomer Republicans were swept out of office by Democrats, and things didn’t change in that leadership team either.

Dawn Clark Netsch is a fine human being who has done much for her state. But her direct, daily experience with Illinois government ended with her loss to Jim Edgar back in 1994 - a dozen years ago. You have to really see this beast up close to get a good idea of what’s going on. Netsch is not a credible witness.

* Then again, there are serious questions about people on both sides of this issue

Then [Rep. Mike Boland], who is seeking his seventh two-year term in the Illinois House, called for term limits. And, as an added starter, he resurrected his long dormant proposal to make the Illinois General Assembly a one-chamber “unicameral” legislature by either eliminating the House or Senate.

A unicameral legislature, such as the one employed by Nebraska, would ensure “we don’t have this kind of personality clashes that hold up progress in our state,” Boland said. […]

What Boland didn’t say was whether he would prefer to eliminate the House, of which he is a member, and keep the Illinois Senate.

Oy.

* Meanwhile, the Tribune editorializes again today on behalf of a quick and fair resolution to serious problems with the con-con ballot question. The Trib wants the IL Supreme Court to step in and accept an expedited appeal

• The people of Illinois are entitled to have their say on a constitutional convention free of the obstacles that schemers have tried to put in their way.

• As is, citizens risk having this vote voided after Nov. 4 when a court rules that it was just too convoluted. That could mean holding another election. What a waste.

Justices, please get involved. You have the power to do the best you can with circumstances not of your making—and not of the plaintiffs’ making. We clearly don’t agree with all of Judge Howse’s thoughts, but he had the courage to put the pure interests of voters first, and the procedural problems of election officials second.

Good for him. We trust you’ll show the same courage. Justices, block this fraud.

* Related…

* Constitutional convention supporters hold rally

* Illinois voters have chance to change constitution

- posted by Rich Miller


36 Comments
  1. - Speaking At Will - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 9:41 am:

    I got three more anti con-con e-mails this morning forwarded to me by various people. All of which are still pushing the “lose your pension” propaganda as the main theme.

    When I saw more of these e-mails I literally pounded my desk and about threw my computer across the room. I need to relax, but these blatant lies surrounding a con-con are extremly annoying.


  2. - Rich Miller - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 9:43 am:

    Forward those to me, please. Thanks.


  3. - Vote Quimby! - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 9:45 am:

    I really, REALLY didn’t need to start off a Monday morning after a Bears loss with a mental image of Netsch doing the Meg Ryan deli scene. Carol, were you that close to deadline? I’ll have what she’s having? What…Gallatin County??


  4. - Been There - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 9:53 am:

    No mention of Kristen McQueary moderating this event so it probably won’t be cancelled.

    Chicago Southland Chamber of Commerce
    Regional Consensus Luncheon
    Con-Con Debate with Lieutenant Gov. Pat Quinn
    Tuesday, October 14, 2008
    11:30 am - 1:00 pm
    Tinley Park Convention Center
    18501 S. Harlem Ave.
    Tinley Park, Illinois
    Phone: (708) 957-6950
    www.chicagosouthland.com
    Member: $25.00
    Non-Member: $35.00
    Table: $240.00


  5. - Greg - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 10:07 am:

    I saw some small anti-con-con signs up inside a local police station. It’s not like they were on the front door, but I thought the fact that I could even see them from the customer service counter was inappropriate.


  6. - Captain Flume - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 10:16 am:

    == legislators choose their voters, not the other way around; ==

    I am not sure what this means. If it is meant literally, and we voters are merely ficticious contructs to put a legitimatizing democratic face on an auctocratic election process, then what prevents a constitutional convention from choosing its voters? Who’s wearting the tinfoil hat here?


  7. - Scooby - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 10:25 am:

    == You have to really see this beast up close to get a good idea of what’s going on. Netsch is not a credible witness. ==

    It’s a contradiction to say that 60% of the electorate should support and vote for a con-con, but unless you’re a super insider you’re not credible enough to speak out against it.


  8. - Excessively rabid - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 10:33 am:

    Illinois Constitution v. 4.0(?), 2009
    Article I.
    The City of Chicago and the County of Cook shall become part of the state of Nebraska, effective immediately. Then we’ll see how effective those Cornhuskers’ legislature is.


  9. - wordslinger - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 10:43 am:

    When you get right down to it, Netsch and Marin are bedrock establishment and have no real beef with the status quo. They fear the great unwashed participating in the process.

    It’s ridiculous any longer to argue that voters really have a choice in GA elections. Which districts? Not with the sophistication level of computerized gerrymandering. Couple leaderships control over the map with their stranglehold on fundraising and the GA is now more than ever the Four Tops and the Mushrooms.

    And unless human nature does a surprise 180, why in the world would leadership voluntarily give up that power? A Con-Con is really the only way.

    Social issues? Total smokescreen. Bring them on. If Netsch and Marin are as progressive as they claim to be, they should be able to build a powerful coalition in Blue Illinois to oppose any right wing/evangelical blitzkrieg.


  10. - Pros of Con - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 10:51 am:

    Netsch isn’t credible because she was instrumental in writing the present document. It is hard to be objective when critiquing your own work. I’m sure there are far more objective experts Carol Marin could base her judgement on, however, as with most of Marin’s opinions there is almost always a hidden agenda.


  11. - The Doc - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 11:20 am:

    Justified or not, I’m immediately suspect of anyone who opposes a con-con as having an alterior motive in support of the status quo. The argument that certain rights regarding social issues (i.e. abortion) will be rescinded, in a state as blue as ours, is truly difficult to fathom, and is certainly not supported by history.


  12. - Rich Miller - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 11:22 am:

    ===It’s a contradiction to say that 60% of the electorate should support and vote for a con-con, but unless you’re a super insider you’re not credible enough to speak out against it.===

    Not what I said. Netsch claims to be an expert. I believe she’s not.


  13. - BannedForLife - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 11:42 am:

    “Dawn Clark Netsch is a fine human being who has done much for her state. But her direct, daily experience with Illinois government ended with her loss to Jim Edgar back in 1994 - a dozen years ago. You have to really see this beast up close to get a good idea of what’s going on. Netsch is not a credible witness.”

    from time to time on your blog you fall back on ad hominem, calling out someone who disagrees with you as out of touch, as if you are the arbiter of who is allowed to have an opinion

    it is not clear to me that the position of blogger offers privileged insights over former legislator

    “Netsch claims to be an expert. I believe she’s not.”

    the best way for you to support your position is to critique Netsch’s reasoning, not Netsch


  14. - Rich Miller - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 11:47 am:

    ===the best way for you to support your position is to critique Netsch’s reasoning, not Netsch===

    Except much of her reasoning is that her experience means she knows best. It’s just political, is her constant refrain. But when I askd her to explain how the problems could be resolved simply through electoral means, she couldn’t answer.

    If you claim to be an expert on the political process and haven’t stepped foot in the Statehouse in a dozen years, that’s a problem.


  15. - Rich Miller - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 11:50 am:

    ===it is not clear to me that the position of blogger offers privileged insights over former legislator===

    Wow. Talk about your ad hominem attacks. lol

    My main gig is publishing a relatively expensive newsletter for Illinois political insiders. So, my real job is to be as connected as humanly possible. I don’t just sit in the office and react. Your statement shows a fundamental misunderstanding of what I do for a living.

    Netsch hasn’t been a legislator in many, many years, so I don’t see how her old experience is valid in today’s world.


  16. - Vote Quimby! - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 12:02 pm:

    Plus I know Rich you have written before about how DCN is defending her ‘child’–the 1970 constitution. When she ran for governor she only won a single county—this means she has the insight in Illinois politics over a man who eats, breathes, walks and talks it every day? This ‘grandmothers advice’ schtick is wearing thin…


  17. - Anon III - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 12:02 pm:

    Prof. Netsch is begging the question. She is saying the problem is not the system; it is just bad boys & girls. She implies that if everybody was a good person, everything would be just fine.

    News flash for Dawn: since the Garden of Eden, we have had men and women behaving badly. The seductive appeal of power and other-peoples’ money has and will always draw naughty ones to politics. It is the norm with which that the system of government must deal. This constitution demonstrably does not deal with the problem.


  18. - BannedForLife - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 12:02 pm:

    ” … when I askd her to explain how the problems could be resolved simply through electoral means, she couldn’t answer.”

    that’s better: the anti-con-con folks don’t have a good explanation of exactly how the electoral process will solve our problems

    “Talk about your ad hominem attacks.”

    well, I’m not even pretending to be a journalist, I’m just another dumb guy in the comments section, one who hasn’t stepped foot in the statehouse

    look, I’m just saying, from a reader’s point of view, it reads sometimes like you go over the line and get personal, and it’s not flattering and it’s not necessary


  19. - Rich Miller - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 12:08 pm:

    ===Dawn Clark Netsch is a fine human being who has done much for her state.===

    Yep. Way too personal on my part.


  20. - Payin' attention - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 12:10 pm:

    “look, I’m just saying, from a reader’s point of view, it reads sometimes like you go over the line and get personal, and it’s not flattering and it’s not necessary”

    From this readers point of view Rich Miller’s willingness to mix it up from time to time and get real sure makes the blog more interesting. Politics ain’t beanbag, after all.


  21. - Scooby - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 12:41 pm:

    == Except much of her reasoning is that her experience means she knows best. ==

    Aren’t you using the same reasoning when you say this:

    == Dawn Clark Netsch is a fine human being who has done much for her state. But her direct, daily experience with Illinois government ended with her loss to Jim Edgar back in 1994 - a dozen years ago. You have to really see this beast up close to get a good idea of what’s going on. Netsch is not a credible witness. ==


  22. - Randall Sherman - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 12:43 pm:

    It is painfully obvious to me that Carol Marin fits in right along with her fellow Lincoln Park lady of naivete, Dawn Clark Netsch. Both women are deluding themselves in believing that even by voting “NO” on Con-Con, the people of Illinois can fix what is broken in Illinois government via other means (like asking our elected leaders real nicely to do the right thing for a change).

    That’s not going to happen ladies! That’s why we need a “YES” vote for Con-Con.

    RANDALL SHERMAN
    Secretary/Treasurer, Illinois Committee for Honest Government
    Chicago


  23. - Rich Miller - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 12:48 pm:

    ===Aren’t you using the same reasoning when you say this:===

    I tried to make that clear. Try reading it again.


  24. - Captain America - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 1:11 pm:

    I like and respect Marin and Netsch - I know Dawn personally. But I don’t need their advice.The establisment opposes the Con-Con simply because it favors the current insiders and power brokers and their powersharing arrangements.

    Illinois goverment is broken - ths system of goverment in Illinois appears to be endemically corrupt from top to bottom. I’m not buying the message that changing leaders/throwing out the rascals is adequate remedy. We’ve had 10 years of crrupt executive leadership in Illinois and legislative dictarorships even longer.

    Send the Democratic and Republican establishment a message - politics and government as usual in Illinois isn’t good enough any more. We can do better. Rock the system by supporting Con-Con.

    I plan to go to the Evanston City Hall and vote yea today - early but not often!


  25. - DuPage Dave - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 1:47 pm:

    D.C. Netsch was a delegate to the last constitutional convention. Apparently she thinks that she is competent to decide the future of Illinois, but no one in today’s generation is. This is the hallmark of the political lifer who has been around too long. Heck, even Richie Daley was a delegate to the last Con-Con, so they weren’t all that fussy about who go in the door.

    A much better known Illinoisan said it best- government of the people, by the people and for the people. Let the people speak. Dawn had her turn 38 years ago.


  26. - 4% - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 2:02 pm:

    Rich,

    With all due respect, if Dawn Clark Netsch is not a credible witness then I would guess that the same would be true for Bruno Behrend? Judy Topinka?

    You’re beginning to sound like Jim Leach!! LOL!


  27. - Bill - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 2:03 pm:

    Speaking,
    I assume that the e-mail is being mailed to active workers. If that is the case then their pensions are at risk if there is a con con. Let’s put aside the questionable “contract” clause in the US Constitution and the questionable court decision referred to by proponents. There are many important benefit provisions that are protected by the current Il. Con. which will be put at risk if the language is deleted. Let’s say for example that you a state employee, age 40, with 15 years of service. Let’s say that your pension plan calls for you to receive 2% of your average salary for each year of service at age 55. So you are 15 years away from retirement and have accrued a pension so far of 30%. Without constitutional protection that is all that you are guaranteed even if the contracts clause applies. Legislation could be passed which lowers your per year of service accrual rate to 1.5% or 1% or .5% or, worse yet, a variable rate determined by the GA or JCAR or SERS or Rod Blagojevich. Would you call that “losing your pension”? What if legislation is passed calling for all future pension benefits to be accrued in a defined contribution plan with the state contribution contingent upon available funding? Would you call that “losing your pension”?
    Those are just two of the scenarios that would be legal if not for the pension clause in the current constitution.
    “Civic groups” and “business groups” are indicating that these types of “solutions” are what they will be advocating if the pension protection clause is removed.
    Anyone covered by a state pension plan who is not set to retire already would have to be crazy to vote for a concon. Just think what your “self-managed” defined contribution plan would be worth today after last week’s crash. But, go ahead, show Rod and those democrats. Cut off your nose to spite your face. That’ll show ‘em.


  28. - Rich Miller - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 2:06 pm:

    ===if Dawn Clark Netsch is not a credible witness then I would guess that the same would be true for Bruno Behrend? Judy Topinka?====

    JBT has only been out of the process for two years, so she saw a lot more recent stuff. BB, as far as I know, isn’t making his experience with the process close hand as his big reason to dump it.


  29. - Bill - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 2:10 pm:

    ==JBT has only been out of the process for two years==
    No offense, but I don’t think Judy was ever in the process.


  30. - Captain Flume - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 2:18 pm:

    == The establisment opposes the Con-Con simply because it favors the current insiders and power brokers and their powersharing arrangements. ==

    That statement would us believe it is only “the establishment” (where are my peace beads?) that may be against a constitutional convention. There may be many who want the maintain the current power structure, and they may not all be members of the “establishment.” The potential for abusive practices by the current power structure has been available since the reduction amendment was okayed by the voters (those uninformed rabble). If there is a vote on a new constitution and the document is rejected, who assumes to cast a stone against the voting public–the same public that gave us the current Governor, the previous Governor, the rejection of an amendatory veto limitations amendment,and a host of other flops? Do I fear the will of the people? No. But I certainly don’t unquestioningly laud their foresight or wisdom. I would like to see a Con-Con just to see what issues are deemed important enough to be included or rejected, and what the delegates believe is a better document than the one we currently have. I mean that.


  31. - Greg - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 2:54 pm:

    Bill, you shouldn’t be making those arguments on a day when most public employees are off. Conversion to defined-contribution plans would be a compelling argument for many of us to vote for a con-con, if it in fact were likely to happen.


  32. - steve schnorf - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 2:59 pm:

    Roughly half of the potentially eligible voters in Illinois don’t bother to register. Of the half that do bother, frequently half or more don’t bother to vote. I could (and have) argued that this is democracy at its best, 3/4 of the eligible voters saying “I don’t give a s— one way or the other”.

    I’m not sure whether that represents a fear of the great unwashed or not, but I personally happen to thing that a better solution to our problems than con-con might be 80-90% registration and 80-90% turnout. Regardless, I continue to believe that our current Constitution and our citizens face more risk than upside with a con-con, and I go with those odds.


  33. - Shore - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 3:00 pm:

    Rich you know this stuff a lot better than I do, but it seems from an outsider’s perspective that the Springfield cabal can’t get anything right with its current deal, how is opening another mess going to fix things? They can’t manage one government so they are going to come together and somehow get religion?


  34. - Rich Miller - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 3:22 pm:

    You’re assuming they will have total control of 118 newly elected delegates. Impossible.


  35. - numbers - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 3:56 pm:

    You don’t need 118 to prevent a question from going to the voters. I think Shore is saying that the odds are that not enough delegates will agree on anything in a convention. I agree. There is an unprecedented (and unrealisitc)level of optimism on here only on this issue.


  36. - Been There - Monday, Oct 13, 08 @ 4:20 pm:

    numbers. I would have to disagree with you. This doesn’t have to be an all or nothing question to put in front of the voters. Each item could be submitted to the voters. I can easily see issues that may get 60 con-con votes. And if nothing else at least the debate can happen without participants who have to worry about how it will be used against them at the ballot box the next time they run.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


ON THE BLOG TODAY...
* Helmets for kids goes down in flames - Thomson will be sold regardless
* Question of the day
* Supremes shoot down property tax exemption for hospital
* More on the Kirk-Obama kerfuffle
* On the brink
* Morning Shorts
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
** Yesterday's blog posts

Support The Capitol Fax Blog
Visit our advertisers...

Search This Blog...

Search the 96th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 96th General Assembly By Keyword

Quick Links


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Polls

Archives
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress
 

  
  » Palm Takeover Rumors Sends Stock Up Even Though Big Miss On The Street Is Expected
  » Review: March Madness on Demand for iPhone
  » Foursquare Adds 100,000 Users In 10 Days
  » The Sheet Of Integrity Has Been Posted — March Madness Has Commenced
  » Pay $9 bucks to look at Final Fantasy XIII on your iPhone

  » Store Batteries in the Freezer to Retain Charge Longer [Batteries]
  » Smart Rescheduler Finds a Time that Works for Everyone in Google Calendar [Scheduling]
  » How to Use Symlinks in Windows [Windows Tip]
  » The Argyle Office [Featured Workspace]
  » Free Up Space in Gmail by Backing Up Everything First [Email]

» Quentin driven to become better hitter
» Watch Out for De Aza
» Peavy deals full repertoire in second start
» Viciedo among five White Sox cuts
» Jenks says 'Next,' Ozzie on Ron Washington

 
     


  » Illinois GOP borrows Brown's strategy in bid for O....
  » Madigan: Security Company Tricked Customers - CBS ....
  » Bernard Schoenburg: Quinn, Madigan go after Brady ....
  » Illinois budget crisis sharpens - World Socialist ....
  » Quinn's small-business tax credit could create 200....
  » The Go-Between - Tablet Magazine..
  » Illinois Supreme Court upholds ruling against Prov....
  » GHS grad wants to be next lieutenant governor - Ga....
  » Blunt, Carnahan campaign against the powers that b....
  » Shop Talk: A Rose by Any Other Name - Roll Call On....


  » Chicago terror suspect pleads guilty
  » Bill to give voters say on U of I trustees fails
  » Feds to buy Illinois prison even without detainees
  » Ill. high court: Hospital shouldn't be tax exempt
  » Report: NIU gunman may have been angry at school
  » Huron Consulting elects new non-exec chairman
  » Navistar gets ratings upgrade from Fitch
  » Quinn plans to sign bill moving primary to March
  » Blagojevich's trial date to stand, judge rules
  » Kraft to cut salt in food by an average of 10% by 2012

  » Duchoissois' Chamberlain Group names James Roberts CEO
  » Chicago Network taps attorney to lead group
  » Boeing puts 747-8 Freighter through test flight
  » Exelon threatens to shut New Jersey nuke plant
  » Caterpillar's North American sales start climbing out of hole


  » Girl shot in head condition upgraded, 2 released
  » Report: NIU gunman may have had grudge against school
  » Chicago terror suspect expected to plead guilty
  » Court: Provena hospital must pay tax
  » 25,000 pounds of honey spill onto the Ike
  » Man charged with trying to hit cop who 'didn't move out of his way'
  » Police commander charged with harassing cop
  » Suspect arrested in crash that killed I-80 worker
  » Far South Side kids learn basics of fire safety
  » Boom, then bust for suburban man


  » Guard, teacher charged with smuggling drugs into jail
  » U.S. planning to buy Thomson even if not used for terrorists
  » Feds buying Thomson prison regardless of use
  » New alderman Graham to pay city for moving out early
  » Ike ramp blocked by honey spill is cleared
  » Priest accused of sex assault denied lower bail
  » Report: Shooter angry at NIU, which was his 'surrogate family'
  » Frank Lloyd Wright house for sale
  » Fetal remains found in hospital's laundry
  » Census ‘bumps in the road’


  » No Details on CPS Clout Admissions, But Tightened Controls
  » Blagojevich Attorneys to Play Tapes When He Testifies
  » Quinn Allows Top Corrections Official to Keep His Job
  » Illinois Primary Pushed Back
  » AIDS Activists Call for More Illinois State Funding
  » Judge: No Delay in Blagojevich's Trial
  » Cook County Courts to Study Use of Electronic Monitoring
  » Cubs Push for New Corporate Logo at Wrigley
  » Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart Says Judges Are Wasting Taxpayer Money
  » Tighter Controls Over "Principal Picks" at Elite City High Schools


  » Feds to buy Illinois prison even without detainees
  » Senate approves lease restriction measure
  » Senate again rejects required motorcycle helmets
  » Illinois Supreme Court: Champaign hospital must pay tax
  » Two men arrested after allegedly fighting each other
  » House strongly rejects electing U of I board
  » Department on Aging lease likely dead
  » Man suspected of burglarizing vacant home
  » Lanphier High School student arrested after disturbance
  » Proposal to make central Illinois historic site national park


  » House moves to ban marijuana-like substance
  » Proposed Southern Illinois coal plant gets boost
  » Volunteer health clinic ends after a decade
  » Illinois Senate shoots down teen motorcyclist helmet law
  » Road work begins in Carbondale


» Warm weather photo gallery
» Naperville man charged with indecent solicitation
» Algonquin murder suspect to get visits from school principal, minister
» Hong Kong delegation trains with Hanover Park firefighters
» Chicago terror suspect expected to plead guilty later today


  » GOPUSA ILLINOIS Daily Clips - March 18, 2010
  » Primary date moved back
  » Sen. Hutchinson: "We haven't been doing that for the last 25-30 years"
  » GOPUSA ILLINOIS Daily Clips - March 17, 2010
  » Conversation starters

» GOP Blocked From Getting Up-or-Down Vote on S..
» The Hunt for Health Care Votes: Democrats to ..
» FNC Party Draws Animated Mix of Journos, Pols..
» Feds to Buy W. Illinois Prison Even Without D..
» Republicans assail IRS provision in health ca..
» House sets aside anti-'deem and pass' resolut..
» Dems defeat GOP resolution to force a vote on..
» Camagueyan Poultry Farmers Work for Recouping..
» House Knocks Down Effort to Block “Deem and P..
» The Go-Between - Tablet Magazine

» Theodore M. Hesburgh: A Setback for Education.....
» The D.C. update - Lexology (registration)...
» Sen. Richard J. Durbin's Profile - Capitol Ne.....
» Republicans Ready Strategy to Scuttle Health .....
» CRAPO NAMED TO NATIONAL COMMISSION ON FISCAL .....

» Blagojevich Denied Request To Delay Corruptio.....
» Senator Roland Burris Announces Recovery Act .....
» National Park proposed for New Philadelphia -.....
» Blagojevich's request for trial delay has bee.....
» DADT Repeal Still Uncertain - Metro Weekly...

    » Webliography: `Deem and pass.'
    » Ironically, it took a long time for me to find this video abouthow long it takes stuff to download on the Internet
    » Health care bill online. Vote expected Sunday, March 21, 2010
    » Chicago man pleads guilty to planning India, Denmark terrorist attacks
    » Obama White House honors Mexico with state dinner May 19
    » Obama White House reaffirms Thomson purchase for Guantanamo detainees
    » Obama on Tiger Woods
    » With health vote looming, Obama postponing Indonesia, Guam, Australia trip
    » Senate Dems Vote To Establish Health Care Task Force
    » The Danger Of STAR Bonds


Header Photos...
Wayne Bretl & UIS


Hosted by MCS